Mar 28, 2016

He is our Peace! ~ Fort William Baptist Church, Scotland


March 13, 2016 ~ Sunday Morning Service, Fort William (Scotland) Baptist Church

  • I never miss a worship opportunity when I'm travelling & it was awesome to be able to attend this Baptist Church in Fort William Scotland recently, and join in with their worship.

Fort William Baptist Church (Scotland) Website

Ravi Zacharias on Servant Leadership

Ravi Zacharias on Servant Leadership

Wait On Lord ~ Maranatha Singers


We Must Wait


Verse 1
I must wait wait wait on the Lord
I must wait wait wait on the Lord
And learn my lessons well
In His timing He will tell me
What to do where to go and what to say


Verse 2
We must wait wait wait on the Lord
We must wait wait wait on the Lord
And learn our lessons well
In His timing He will tell us
What to do where to go and what to say


Verse 3
You must wait wait wait on the Lord
You must wait wait wait on the Lord
And learn Your lessons well
In His timing He will tell you
What to do where to go and what to say

CCLI Song # 38222
Randy Thomas
© 1979 Maranat

At The Cross Medley ~ Gaithers



Steve Martin Sings 'Atheists Don't Have No Songs'

What do atheist's sing about when they get together? When comedian Steve Martin thought about this he teamed up with his band, The Steep Canyon Rangers, to make a song. And the result is absolutely hilarious!

Mar 21, 2016

Brief History of Spiritual Revival ~ Patrick Morley

A Brief History of Spiritual Revival and Awakening in America

In describing what happened in Jonathan Edward’s Northampton, Mass., church in 1734, observers said, “It pleased God … to display his free and sovereign mercy in the conversion of a great multitude of souls in a short space of time, turning them from a formal, cold and careless profession of Christianity, to the lively exercise of every Christian grace, and the powerful practice of our holy religion.”

12.22.CC.UnderbellyRevical
“America has a deep, rich history of revivals and awakenings.”

That’s about as clear a definition as we’ll ever get! During a revival, God supernaturally transforms believers and nonbelievers in a church, locale, region, nation or the world through sudden, intense enthusiasm for Christianity. People sense the presence of God powerfully; conviction, despair, contrition, repentance and prayer come easily; people thirst for God’s word; many authentic conversions occur and backsliders are renewed.
Revival and awakening are, generally, synonyms. The larger the geography a revival covers, the greater the tendency to call it an awakening.
America has a deep, rich history of revivals and awakenings.

Revivals in America: A Well-Travelled Road
The Great Awakening, 1734-43. In December 1734, the first revival of historic significance broke out in Northampton, Mass., where a young Jonathan Edwards was pastor. After months of fruitless labor, he reported five or six people converted—one a young woman. He wrote, “[She] had been one of the greatest company-keepers in the whole town.” He feared her conversion would douse the flame, but quite the opposite took place. Three hundred souls converted in six months—in a town of only 1,100 people! The news spread like wildfire, and similar revivals broke out in over 100 towns. Starting in Philadelphia in 1739, George Whitfield’s dramatic preaching was like striking a match to the already-underway awakening. An estimated 80 percent of America’s 900,000 Colonists personally heard Whitfield preach. He became America’s first celebrity.

The Second Great Awakening, 1800-1840. In 1800, only one in 15 of America’s population of 5,300,000 belonged to an evangelical church. Presbyterian minister James McGready presided over strange spiritual manifestations in Logan County, Ky. The resulting camp meeting revivals drew thousands from as far away as Ohio. Rev. Gardiner Spring reported that for the next 25 years not a single month passed without news of a revival somewhere. In 1824, Charles Finney began a career that would eventually convert 500,000 to Christ. An unparalleled 100,000 were converted in Rochester, N.Y., in 1831 alone—causing the revival to spread to 1,500 towns. By 1850 the nation’s population exploded fourfold to 23,000,000 people, but those connected to evangelical churches grew nearly tenfold from 7 percent to 13 percent of the population—from 350,000 to 3,000,000 church members!

The Businessmen’s Revival of 1857-1858. In 1857, the North Dutch Church in New York City hired a businessman, Jeremiah Lanphier, to be a lay missionary. He prayed, “Lord, what would you have me do?” Concerned by the anxious faces of businessmen on the streets of New York City, Lanphier decided to open the church at noon so businessmen could pray. The first meeting was set for September 23—three weeks before the Bank Panic of 1857. Six attended the first week, 20 the next, then 40, then they switched to daily meetings. Before long all the space was taken, and other churches also began to open up for businessmen’s prayer meetings.15 Revivals broke out everywhere in 1857, spreading throughout the United States and world. Sometimes called The Great Prayer Meeting Revival, an estimated 1,000,000 people were added to America’s church rolls, and as many as 1,000,000 of the 4,000,000 existing church members also converted.

The Civil War Revival, 1861-1865. The bitter dispute over slavery thrust our nation into the deadliest war we’ve ever experienced. By the end, 620,000 Americans lay dead—one out of every 50 of the 31,000,000 people counted in the 1860 census. At the start of the Civil War in 1861, it seemed as though the soldiers for both sides had left their Christianity at home and gone morally berserk. By 1862, the tide turned, first among the Confederate forces. An estimated 300,000 soldiers were converted, evenly divided between the Southern and Northern Armies.

The Urban Revivals, 1875-1885. Young businessman Dwight L. Moody participated in the Great Revival of 1857 as it swept Chicago.19 Moody later conducted revivals throughout the British Isles where he spoke to more than 2,500,000 people. In 1875, Moody returned home and began revivals in America’s biggest cities. Hundreds of thousands were converted and millions were inspired by the greatest soul winner of his generation.20 At this time, the general worldview of Americans was shifting away from a Christian consensus. Darwinism and higher criticism were gaining traction, and Moody became the first evangelist to come under attack—accused of making religion the opiate of the masses.21
By the turn of the 20th century, the mood of the country was changing. Outside the church, it was the era of radio, movies and the “Jazz Age.” World War I led to a moral letdown and the Roaring Twenties. When that era came to an abrupt end on October 29, 1929, followed by the Great Depression, there was surprisingly little interest in spiritual revival.22 Inside the church, a half-century long battle raged between evangelicalism and theological liberalism, which had penetrated major denominations.23 The effect was that 20th-century revivals were more limited in scope, and lacked the broad impact on society of earlier awakenings.

The Revivals of 1905-1906. Word of the Welsh Revival of 1904-1905 spread to Welsh-speaking settlers in Pennsylvania in late 1904 and revival broke out. By 1905, local revivals blazed in places like Brooklyn, Michigan, Denver, Schenectady, Nebraska, North and South Carolina, Georgia, Taylor University, Yale University, and Asbury College in Wilmore, Kentucky.25 Billy Sunday, who became a key figure about this time, preached to more than 100,000,000 people with an estimated 1,000,000 or more conversions.26
The Azusa Street Revival, 1906. In 1906, William J. Seymour, an African-American Holiness pastor blind in one eye, went to Los Angeles to candidate for a pastoral job. But after he preached, he was locked out of the second service! He began prayer meetings in a nearby home and the Spirit of God, which they called “the second blessing,” fell after many months of concerted prayer. Eventually, the interracial crowds became so large they acquired a dilapidated Methodist church at 312 Azusa Street where daily meetings continued for three years. The resulting Pentecostal Movement and the later Charismatic Movement, which both exploded worldwide in the 20th century, both trace their roots to this revival.

The Post-World War II Awakening. After World War II, in 1947 and 1948, Pentecostals experienced two strands of an awakening, one the Latter Rain Revival and the other the Healing Revival. Large numbers of evangelicals also experienced revival resulting in many conversions. It was at this time that a great generation of Christian leaders emerged. Bill Bright began Campus Crusade for Christ. In 1949, Billy Graham’s distinguished career, which popularized evangelical Christianity for a new generation, exploded on the scene during his Los Angeles crusade sponsored by the Christian Businessmen’s Committee.30,31 An estimated 180,000,000 people attended his nearly 400 crusades, and millions more viewed on television.32 College Revivalsstarted as early as 1946, but when the prayer-based Wheaton College Revival of 1950 achieved national publicity, it sparked other college revivals throughout America.

The Charismatic Renewal and Jesus Movement. During the late 1960s and early 1970s more revivals of national scope developed. The first strand was the Charismatic Renewal, which spread far beyond Pentecostal and Holiness churches to college campuses, the Catholic Church and mainline denominations.34 The second strand, the widely publicized Jesus Movement, emphasized turning from drugs, sex and radical politics to taking the Bible at face value and finding Jesus Christ as personal Savior.35 Not surprisingly, this revival spread to college campuses, most notably the 1970 Asbury College Revival in Wilmore, Ky. Within a week the revival had spread throughout the entire country.36 In 1976 America elected a born-again president, and evangelicalism has continued to prosper from then to now.

The Mid-1990s Revivals. Despite the widespread secularization of society since the Cultural Revolution that began in the late 1960s, in the mid-1990s God once again brought a series of revivals, mostly to Charismatic and Pentecostal groups. In 1994 it was The Toronto Blessing, and 1995 ushered in the Melbourne Revival on Florida’s Space Coast, the Modesto Revival, and theBrownsville Revival in Pensacola, Fla., which recorded 100,000 conversions in two years.37 College Revivals swept across America, starting at Howard Payne University in Brownwood, Texas, under the preaching of Henry Blackaby, a Southern Baptist.

The Promise Keepers Revival, the most publicized of the mid-1990s Revivals, began in 1991 when 4,200 men descended on the University of Colorado to be challenged to live up to their faith. In 1993, 50,000 men assembled from every state and 16 nations. In the following years, stadium events were conducted in cities throughout the United States. A spirit of revival and transformation swept across America as millions of men attended. The revival reached its zenith on October 4, 1997, as 1,000,000 or more men gathered on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. By the close of 2000, Promise Keepers reported 5,000,000 had attended 100 conferences. An additional 1,000,000 men have been impacted since.

10 Characteristics of Revivals
Each revival or awakening leaves its own heat signature; in 1740 youth led the way, in 1857 businessmen and prayer took center stage, and the 1906 Azusa Street revival was decidedly interracial. Yet all share common themes. What are the most frequently mentioned characteristics of revivals and awakenings in literature?
1. TIMING: Revivals emerge during times of spiritual and moral decline, which leads to intense prayer.
2. PRAYER: God puts a longing into the hearts of many to pray for revival.
3. THE WORD: The preaching or reading of God’s Word brings deep conviction and desire for Christ.
4. THE HOLY SPIRIT: The Holy Spirit takes people to a spiritual depth they could not achieve on their own.
5. CONVICTION: Affected sinners are inconsolable except in Christ.
6. GLORY FOR GOD: God receives praise, honor and glory for bringing revival.
7. REFORMATION AND RENEWAL: Revival produces lasting fruit. New ministries are founded and society experiences a reform of morals as more and more people convert.
8. MANIFESTATIONS: Manifestations like fainting, groaning prayer and miracles vary by culture and denomination.
9. MESSY: Revivals are messy—controversies swirl about miracles, abuses, excesses, suspicions and theological disputes (to name but a few).
10. CYCLICAL: Revivals inevitably crest and decline.

Is America Ripe for Revival Today?
A majority of Americans believe our country is going downhill. Yet church attendance as a percent of population has held steady since 1990, and probably since 1940.51 America added 50,000 new churches in the last 20 years of the 20th century to total 350,000.52 The number of born-again Christians has grown steadily to 46 percent of adults today.53 Given the state of moral and spiritual decay, how is that possible?
The answer is simple. Today, Christianity is prevalent but not powerful. The solution is spiritual revival and awakening.
We’ve not had an awakening in America of historic proportion for a long time. With such a great tradition of revival and awakening, a great base from which to start, and a great need to counteract the increasing moral and spiritual decline, our nation appears ripe for a fresh outpouring of God’s Spirit.
But history tells us that national revivals and awakenings cannot be manufactured. They are sovereign acts of mercy and grace by God Himself, when He supernaturally achieves in a short span what seems otherwise impossible. However, God loves to respond to the prayers of His people (e.g., 2 Chronicles 7:14).
While the decision belongs to God alone, He gives us the privilege of hastening the day through humble repentant prayer. Let us pray …

Dr. James Dobson's March Newsletter

Dr. James Dobsons March Newsletter


NOTE: The following letter was completed two weeks ago and deals with the upcoming presidential election as it relates the U.S. Supreme Court. It addresses a subject of extreme importance to the future of this great nation. Family Talk would have gone to print with this letter and mailed or emailed it immediately to several hundred thousand people on our list of constituents. However, America lost one of its most articulate voices three days after I finished my letter, which required this introduction.

Almost coincidentally, it seems, my wife Shirley and I were having our personal devotional time on February 13th when the telephone rang. A member of my staff, Becky Lane, was calling to inform me of the sudden death of Antonin Scalia, Justice to the Supreme Court. His passing came as an enormous shock to millions of conservative Americans. Scalia has been for decades one of the most articulate, brilliant, and conservative members of the Court. His death could literally change the institution of the family and the moral character of America. I am among those who grieve his passing.

As you will read below, I wrote about Justice Scalia in my letter. His death is a tragic loss to those of us who have fought to preserve the sanctity of human life, the integrity of traditional marriage, The Second Amendment, and other conservative causes. The concern that led me to write this letter has been multiplied a thousandfold by his passing. I pray you will read these words carefully as they relate to the presidential primaries and the election next November.
_________________________


Dear Friends,

As I hope the entire nation remembers, we are rapidly approaching our national elections on November 8th, 2016, when the next President of the United States will be selected. That individual will be inaugurated on January 20th, 2017, and will become the Leader of the Free-World. It is impossible to overstate the importance of this decision. As the founder and president of a nonprofit organization, Family Talk, I can’t and won’t try to suggest how you should vote. However, I can speak candidly about what is at stake for this great nation. And I will. . .

I believe this is one of the most significant national elections in American history. The future of our nation is hanging in the balance, and we dare not make a mistake this time around. I’m told our next president could eventually nominate between two and four Justices to the U.S. Supreme Court. If confirmed by the Senate, those Justices will serve for life, and their decisions won’t have to conform to “the will of the people” or to Congressional leadership.

If the Court makes more horrendous decisions, as it did in Dred Scott v. Sandfordin 1857, the results will be catastrophic. That ruling declared black people to be the property of their slave masters and had no full rights to citizenship. Can you believe learned men made such an outrageous decision? It led to a Civil War that took the lives of 600,000 men before it came to a bloody conclusion in 1865.

Roe v. Wade was another historic ruling handed down by the Court in 1973. It has resulted in the murders of 58 million babies to date, and the killing goes on.

Yet another terrible decision by the Court was handed down on June 26, 2015, when five members of the Court issued their imperious ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. It redefined for the American people the meaning of marriage. This institution has consisted exclusively of one man and one woman since the days of the Founding Fathers, and long before. In fact, the family dates back to the Garden of Eden when, at least 5,000 years ago, the Creator gave it meaning and definition. Before Obergefell, thirty states had voted to include the traditional understanding of marriage in their constitutions. But the Supreme Court, acting as a judicial oligarchy, overrode the wishes of 50 million people and replaced them with their own bias. The arrogance of this Court is breathtaking!

If America chooses a weak and feckless president in 2016 as it did in 2008 and 2012, we could be “governed” (yes, governed) by an imperious Court for decades. This is my greatest concern about the outcome of the next election. It is no frivolous matter, especially when so few Christians are expected to vote. God help us if people of faith are so irresponsible as to stay home again this year. Again, so much is hanging in the balance.

Did you read in the January 26 Washington Post that a man attending a town hall in Decorah, Iowa, asked Hillary Clinton if one of her appointments to the Supreme Court could be President Obama? Her answer was chilling: “Wow, what a great idea! Nobody has ever suggested that to me. Wow, I love that!”

Thomas Jefferson warned repeatedly about the emergence of an out–of-control judiciary that would destroy the Constitution and, along with it, America’s fundamental freedoms. He first became alarmed when, in 1803, the U. S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision called Marbury v. Madison. It allowed the Justices to rule on the constitutionality of every legal issue, both inside and outside the government, giving itself unrivaled power. The concept of “checks and balances” that was intended to keep one branch from eclipsing the other two. It is no longer in force—at least not with regard to the judiciary.

When Jefferson recognized the full implications of the Marbury decision, he wrote this prophetic statement: “To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.”

BINGO! What we have today, 213 years later, is an oligarchy (rule by a small cadre of elites.) The courts simply strike down laws and policies they don’t like, whether their opinions reflect the provisions of the Constitution or not. Furthermore, the activist judges and those who support them have turned the Constitution into what they call “a living, breathing document,” in which its actual words no longer mean what they say. The Constitution “evolves,” they tell us, to fit the biases of the Court. Consequently, we no longer have a government “of the people, by the people and for the people,” as Abraham Lincoln described it at Gettysburg. It is, indeed—an oligarchy.

The Marbury decision in 1803 continued to agitate Jefferson for the next two decades. He wrote in 1819: "The Constitution. . . is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please.” “It has long been my opinion, and I have never shrunk from its expression . . . that the germ of dissolution of our federal government is in the constitution of the federal Judiciary; working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped."

Jefferson issued one more warning in 1823, just three years before his death. This time, however, he was not simply predicting the rise of an imperious court; by then he had observed it first hand. Jefferson said, "At the establishment of our constitution, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous.”

Now, the misfortune that worried Jefferson has produced for us a culture of death that is steeped in moral relativism. We are victims in our day of the grab for power that should have been squelched two centuries ago. Since then, the Supreme Court Justices have simply overridden the will of the people, regularly and without apology. Every time they convene as a body it is like a mini-constitutional convention in which the meaning of the foundational document is changed without the consent of the governed. Henceforth, their pronouncements are the ultimate law of the land.

As we have seen, it was never intended to be that way. The Executive, the Legislative and the Judicial branches of government are “co-equal” in the eyes of the law. We know that the President and Congress regularly limit each other’s authority, but what about the Judiciary? Many Americans do not know that Article 3, Section 1 of the Constitution clearly gives to Congress the power to establish every court with the exception of the Supreme Court. All the lower federal courts,

including the courts of appeal, serve at the pleasure of the Congress. They can be abolished at will.

The troublesome Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco consistently issues off-the-wall rulings, such as the Newdow case in 2002. It declared the reciting of the Pledge of Allegiance to be unconstitutional because it contains the phrase, “One Nation under God.” Fortunately, the Supreme Court struck down that ruling two years later on procedural grounds. This Ninth Circuit Court has been overruled more than any other in history, which could cause Congress to decommission it and create another to take its place. Unfortunately, Congress lacks the political will to do its duty. Consequently, the Courts arrogantly thumb their noses at the other co-equal branches of government.

It is outrageous that we, the people of the United States, not only find ourselves governed unwillingly by a judicial oligarchy, but we are manhandled and lectured by this tiny body of lawyers who increasingly base their rulings—not on our Constitution, nor on legal precedent, nor even on international law—but on something they call “world opinion.” The American people have neither chosen nor agree with this opinion. Justice Kennedy and his liberal colleagues simply pick and choose the people in countries or continents that agree with them, usually from Europe and Canada, and ignore the rest, such as South America, Asia, and Africa. This is what we call “judicial tyranny!” and for good reason.

Justice Antonin Scalia, one of the most conservative and brilliant of the Jurists, referred to his colleagues on the Court as “black-robed masters.” He continued, “So it is literally true . . .that the court has essentially liberated itself from the text of the Constitution, and even from the traditions of the American people.”

Scalia said, finally, “The Constitution is not a living organism, for Pete's sake. It's a legal document. And like all legal documents, it says some things and it doesn't say others. . . Within the last 20 years, we have found. . . the right to abortion, which was so little rooted in the traditions of the American people that it was criminal for 200 years—[and] the right to homosexual sodomy.” Thank God for Scalia, who has fought to defend the Constitution as written by our Founding Fathers. He is the Court’s most consistent “originalist.”

Please tell me you understand the danger of the situation that faces us. To put ultimate power in the hands of those who promise to make up their rules as they go along—or to base them on treaties that were never ratified by Congress—is a recipe for disaster. As you consider the primaries in your state by which the nominees within political parties will be selected, I hope you will take the time to become informed of the issues and the candidates’ qualifications. Ask them how they will select nominees to the Court. Then register and vote for the person of your choice. And by all means, we should pray that God will give us wisdom and good judgment as we cast our ballots.

I’ll say it again. We can’t afford a mistake this time around. There is just too much at risk. Our great nation is in serious danger.


 ------
Sincerely,

The Fire Must Never Go Out ~ Eric Smith


THIS NEW BOOK is Available on Amazon

The Fire Must Never Go Out: A study on living a life of fire from the Beatitudes Kindle Edition 


When Christianity is lived out in complete and total obedience to the words of Jesus, it is oftentimes viewed as radical. Throughout the New Testament, followers of Christ are described as effective, full of power and consistently defeating demonic powers at every turn. Why would the church today settle for anything less? Why would we accept what's viewed as normal, boring Christianity, when God created us for robust and abundant Christianity? In the eight Beatitudes of Jesus, we find that robust mandate that serves to ignite the fire of God in our lives. The message of The Fire Must Never Go Out, is designed to awaken your heart and drive out sleepy, static Christianity from your life. This book will set you on a course to encounter God in a much deeper fashion and stir the fire of revival in your life.

_____________________________________


Eric B. Smith is a pastor, author, church planter, and revivalist. He is a gifted teacher who is currently the lead pastor of Destiny Church in Dayton, Ohio. His favorite titles by far are, husband, father, and grandpa. He and his wife Juli, reside with their children in the Dayton, Ohio area.

Why Women Live Longer Than Men ~ #25

25 Photos That Show Reasons Why Women Live Longer Than Men.  

#25.


Nothing Between ~ Charles Tindley

Neville Peter sings... Nothing Between.

1
Nothing between my soul and the Savior,
Naught of this world’s delusive dream;
I have renounced all sinful pleasure;
Jesus is mine, there’s nothing between.
Nothing between my soul and the Savior,
So that His blessed face may be seen;
Nothing preventing the least of His favor,
  Keep the way clear! Let nothing between.
2
Nothing between, like worldly pleasure;
Habits of life, though harmless they seem,
Must not my heart from Him e’er sever;
He is my all, there’s nothing between.
3
Nothing between, like pride or station;
Self-life or friends shall not intervene;
Though it may cost me much tribulation,
I am resolved; there’s nothing between.
4
Nothing between, e’en many hard trials,
Though the whole world against me convene;
Watching with prayer and much self-denial,
I’ll triumph at last, with nothing between.
 Charles Albert Tindley (1851-1933)

At The Cross ~ E. Dewey Smith


Saints and Sinners

Spring 2016 ~ A Season of Renewal


ἁγίοις & ἁμαρτωλῶν (Saints and Sinners)

     Well at least according to my calendar it is Spring already! Perhaps though you can say that we've just finished "the winter that really wasn't a winter at all".  There were few contrasts between finishing and starting these two seasons. Yesterday I returned home with Andrea from a mid-year visit with Ryan and Danae overseas where they are attending school this year. We squeezed in lots of events, hikes and visits in several weeks.  




We visited medieval cities, toured ancient Scottish castles, explored lochs and climbed over mountains on the Isle of Skye and ate too many English breakfasts.  How awesome to be able to spend time with family. 






















While flying as a passenger between London and Glasgow, I noticed an amusing article in the London Times.  Well more accurately, I find it only partially amusing, more so greatly concerning as a student of the Word, because of it's erroneous anti-biblical "works" nature yet espoused by that church.  


     The Times header blared "Pope asks why it costs 750,000 Euros ($1.1 million CDN) to become a saint"(Article: Pope asks Why 750,000 Euros? ).  
     The article explains the Roman Catholic Church's dilemma and "process" of achieving sainthood, and exposed some of the downside of it's so-called "saint-factory" system, including the expenses required to conduct research by the "postulators".  A Postulator apparently is the person who guides the church's beatification or canonization process through the various RC judicial steps.  Evidently, the postulator's research must verify two miracles attributed to the candidate that are required to confirm sainthood. If the postulator's finds are positive, the process leads to a new saint, according to their system. 

     The gist of the article is that it seems that the Pope is concerned that lately there have been inflated fees and considerable conflicts of interest in the process. Saintly candidates attracting the most donations were sailing through the process, leaving less well-funded candidates behind, and thus a new system is now being implemented to prevent the sleaze that has been occurring. With such high fees, there have apparently been many hands in the cookie jar and they are attempting to stop it.

     Through our Route 66 bible studies, the ANVIL Newsletter has recently looked at eleven books of the New Testament, from Ephesians thru to James verse by verse thus far.  While this is barely over forty percent of the New Testament books that we've studied, nowhere do we yet see any evidence requiring us to have such a complicated process towards Sainthood.   Instead what I do see when I study is God's "Gospel of Grace, through faith in Jesus Christ".  We find it's really not anything about what I've done that qualifies me for Sainthood....rather we find that it's ALL of what Christ has done on my behalf!   In fact, the greatest way that I figure into God's salvation scheme is that of a Recipient of His benefits towards me!  

"...But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us." ~ Romans 5:8

      Paul uses the Greek word "hagioi" (
ἁγίοις), meaning a "saint" or "most holy thing" in his letter when addressing the Christians at Ephesus, and at Corinth.  

"...To the church of God that is in Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints together with all those who in every place call upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, both their Lord and ours." 1 Corinthians 1:2

John similarly reminds us in Revelation.  God sees us as having Jesus own righteousness, because Christ became sin for us.  Jesus is my Propitiation, my Sin-Covering.  His blood has figuratively obliterated and obscured my sin.   Yes the bible tells me that despite my sin I am now a Saint because of what Christ did for me!  ...for Me?   ...but can that really be true?   

  • I'm a Saint yet I don't remember going before the beatification panel to conclude several miracles, 
  • I'm a Saint yet I sure didn't have anybody pay my million dollar canonization fees 
  • I'm a Saint yet the donor administration department didn't have to be recommissioned due to excessive fees because of my application.  ...and what's more, 
  • I can even enjoy my Sainthood while I am still very much alive!  This is all true despite the fact that figuratively, I was the one caught with my hand in the cookie-jar so to speak, yet I still get the free pass to Sainthood.  REJOICE!  Yes it's true!  ...if you are in Christ Jesus, YOU are a Saint.
     Sainthood is free for me, but it cost Christ his life through a cruel death on a Roman cross! Christian be in Absolute Awe as you stand to worship this Easter season!  Marvel again at what Christ has done for YOU.  Let the ever-freshness of His Spirit bring His Spring Renewal into your heart and life as you extend your arms in Worship to the One Who has taken you through to Sainthood through His Grace that you really know you don't deserve.  
~ by St. Mark

Mar 1, 2016

What does the Bible say about "Headship"?

Related Studies:
~~~~~

GODLY CONSTITUTED HEADSHIP

Godly Constituted Headship recognizes the Biblical requirement that the ruling elders in the church be godly men. It further recognizes their collective accountability to both Jesus, who is the head of the church and the church body for its governance, leadership and welfare. The elders stand as sentinels providing protection for the church by ensuring that doctrinal purity, unity and holiness are maintained.
Gen 1-3, 1 Tim 3:1 – 7, 1 Tim 2: 1 & 2, Titus 1: 5 – 9, Heb. 13:17

 

After the Service...


What Does the Bible Teach about Headship? ~ A. Kostenberger

kephalé: the head

Original Word: κεφαλή, ῆς, ἡ
Part of Speech: Noun, Feminine
Transliteration: kephalé
Phonetic Spelling: (kef-al-ay')
Short Definition: the head
Definition: (a) the head, (b) met: a corner stone, uniting two walls; head, ruler, lord.

_____________________________________________________________________________


Andreas J. Kostenberger serves as professor of New Testament and director of PhD/ThM Studies at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary.
The opening chapters of Genesis narrate God’s creation first of Adam, then of Eve from and for Adam as his “suitable helper” (Gen. 2:18, 20). The notion of Adam’s “headship,” that is, his position of ultimate responsibility and authority for his marriage and family, is supported by a series of factors:
  • Adam’s creation prior to the woman
  • Adam’s naming of the animals prior to the creation of Eve
  • Adam’s naming of Eve subsequent to God’s creation of her
  • God’s holding Adam—not Eve—responsible for his and Eve’s sin even though Eve had sinned first
  • the woman’s designation as the man’s “suitable helper”
In the New Testament, Paul speaks of Adam’s representative actions on behalf of all of humanity (his “federal headship”) and of Christ’s serving as the head of a new humanity (Rom. 5:12–21). Paul also repeatedly affirms God’s creation first of Adam and then of Eve and on this basis makes pronouncements with regard to the man’s headship (1 Cor. 11:8–9; 1 Tim. 2:13).

Thus in 1 Cor. 11:3–5, reference is made to Christ’s headship over the man; the husband’s headship over his wife; and God’s headship over Christ, conveying the notion of authority (cf. 1 Cor. 11:10). 

In Ephesians, Paul speaks of Christ’s headship over all things in the church, again conveying the notion of authority (Eph. 1:21–22; cf. 4:15; Col. 1:18; 2:10, 19).

In Eph. 5:23, Paul writes that the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church. This connotes both loving provision (Eph. 5:25–29) and authority (Eph. 5:22). Hence Christ’s headship in a primary sense and the husband’s headship over his wife in a derivative sense are an integral part of Paul’s teaching on the nature of the church Christ’s “body.”
Today, the husband’s headship is challenged by some who claim that the New Testament teaches the husband’s and the wife’s “mutual submission” with reference to Eph. 5:21. However, in context it is only the wife that is called to submit (Eph. 5:22; cf. Col. 3:18) while the husband is called to love his wife sacrificially (Eph. 5:25–27).

Both 1 Cor. 11:3 and the Christ-husband analogy in Eph. 5:23 strongly suggest the husband’s headship in the home, and passages such as 1 Tim. 2:12 and 3:2 indicate that men are assigned ultimate responsibility and authority in the church. This congruity between God’s order for the home and the church flows from the fact that the church is “God’s household” (1 Tim. 3:15).

While the senses “source” and “pre-eminent” have been proposed for kephalē, no passage is extant where that sense is favored by the context. In fact, every time one person is referred to as the “head” of another person in both biblical and extrabiblical literature, the person who is the “head” has authority over the other person and kephalē conveys the notion of authority.

For further study see my commentary on the Pastoral Epistles in the Expositor’s Bible Commentary Vol. 12 (rev.ed.; Zondervan); God, Marriage & Family; and my various other publications on Gender and Family.